Sunday, April 19, 2026

Jesus and the apostles used it (Scripture) and derived further conclusions from it through reasoning...

After all, the Scripture was not given to us merely to be repeated but to be pondered and expressed in our own language; Jesus and the apostles used it and derived further conclusions from it through reasoning; the Scripture is not a legal code or a systematic theology but the principium of theology; as the Word of God, it binds us not only in its literal words but also in what is legitimately deduced from it. Moreover, no reflection on the truth of Scripture and therefore no theological activity is possible without using such words that do not occur in Scripture. Not only in the doctrine of the Trinity but also every other dogma and in the entire field of theology, expressions and terms are used that are not found in Scripture. With these names, therefore, the autonomy of the Christian, the right of theology, is involved. And finally, these do not serve to introduce new dogmas outside of Scripture or in conflict with it but precisely to maintain the truth of Scripture against heresy. They have much more negative than positive significance. They indicate the lines within which Christian thought must move in order not to lose the truth of revelation at the hands of heresy.

Herman Bavinck (1854-1921)
The Holy Trinity (1895)

Such a posture should not be surprising, nor considered as lowering Scripture's status, rather quite the opposite; unsurprising then elevating. Quite aligned with traditional Logic as the Science of Sciences, if to understand the aforesaid as merely the study then fine-tuning of the mind's innate even unavoidable abilities and propensities. To compare, the athlete does not study and train so to learn the method of running, rather to improve and perfect (as humanly possible) his/her natural yet unrefined ability to run; so it is with the study of Logic.

With that said, Bavinck implies hence proposes Scripture as Primary Source provided and revealed by God the Creator of all creation thereby First Cause of all causes and effects. In this way, Scripture is not reduced to humanity's considerations, rather elevated not to a higher status but the highest regard and reverence from which to deduce then induce, in a word; ratiocination. Accordingly, at least since Aristotle's work on Logic entitled Organon, inquirers and researchers of all sorts of disciplines, including logicians especially, have emphasized the consistent determinations of names, definitions, then categories, later organized per the Porphyrian Tree or the Tree of Porphyry, and later still as genera and species.

When fire and the wheel were first utilized, invented, and later studied, words like incandescent, luminous, else cylindrical, ambulatory were not initially named, defined, then categorized, yet no less applicable and accurate their longstanding associations and representations. So it is with doctrinal words like Trinity that have been long deduced then induced from Scripture as the Primary Source resulting from the First Cause, subsequently then consistently named, defined, and categorized.


Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.

Is 1:18, Mt 5:9, 2 Tm 2:15, Cl 3:23

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Mysteries as Love’s Epistles... poetic epic taken from my 9th book of 2017...

Poetic epic taken from my 9th book The MEMPHIS NIGHTCLUB MURDERS & Other Poetic Mysteries (Feb 2007); a collection of poetic mysteries (short stories) and various epics, poems, and verses...



Mysteries as Love’s Epistles

~ A Poetic Perambulation ~

From sunlit porticos, upon ivied columns along corridors
Twinges pitch hence pang, at pith and pit of inner core
Flesh twain, apart, the distancing bane, liken fleeing harts
Per hunt, such harm by hubris, with this, Ego’s abstract art

Beneath cool archways and arbors, hanging so voluptuous
Blooms of petals dewed, swelled skins of fruit sensuous
Timid as tumid, lust slows then grows, as passions insist
Twitching the lips, twisting the tongues, until pair by tryst

Hesitant she as desirous, impressions still as indecisions
Reluctant he as delirious by abstractions, her divinations
Or by intoxications, he dreams in trance mid funeral pyres
With tambourine she dances, as gypsies `round ritual fires

Stung then the lies, alas foregone shit stings like thistles
Forget they must, to trust the mysteries as Love’s epistles
Low the tears, hard as rain, from cheek to breasts the mist
Stained shirt, strained skirt by four hands vised as one fist

Pressed till wrested, palms to palms, fingers form coitus
Side by side, thigh feels thigh, sighs until cries arduous
Night falls like Turin shroud, as one hundred candles burn
Akin to moths, they flit and flutter o’er hurts, each in turn

O to learn from past spurns, withal, hearts always callow
Within fervor’s fury, Passion smolders as cloth in tallow
Beguiled, wiled, maybe a bit maudlin (often lovers’ coffin)
Such uncoiling as mortals collide, an erotic storm therein

Singed wings by old flings, or some other goddamn thing
Wounds to scars, hang far into mind, on sullied brass rings
Liken black-lighted rooms, archetypal galleries of Self-art
Jungian pelf on psychotic carts, pile high as none departs

No one imparts dissimilar, for bent as this is quite familiar
Mortals’ birthright, Strife (oft miswritten as Life), millers
As such, and much if not all, burns as fire, as well warms
Ill, fraught, still sought, some reason amid passion’s norms

Two souls stumble and struggle, past the doors and closets
Down Fear’s hall, groping mid walls scrawled with posits
Harshest of truths, rarely sleuthed, either animus or anima
Keener incubus, or inner vox humana as morning’s manna

Ergo subtle nuances, so it goes, snakes in pile, calm or riled
Good portends, while Evil pretends, as sanity slips into exile
To Patmos isle, upon insanity’s bile, to flirt in foolish mirth
Misanthropes de trop or not, tho’ hoping of one logical firth

Oh Love rebirths, seemingly recherché among worldly frays
Swirling displays; corpses rigor-ed, souls cold, hearts filleted
As well minds abysmal, yea, the warmth by fervid baptismal
Regardless the chances dismal, or tenacious choices chrismal

Onerous to bedchamber, beyond last tread and rise, thus run
By Godspeed, hand o’er foot, sweat on brow, neither outdone
Alas cursed by sad verse, John Donne’s madness his sorrow
Anguish'd, not that 'twas sin, but that 'twas she, a fervid woe

Twin in throes, thrust into lustful trust, their melding flesh
As continents clash, or welding of steel, white hot the mesh
Paramours threshing out the Love, without doubt or pause
Hesitation now epicurean determination, their shared cause

To floor the vase shatters, water splatters and roses scatter
Prurient the groans swore, more variant the moans blather
Dethroned then devoured, Pride as well the whore Despair
A sudden Diaspora, by Love diademed and Passion the heir

Brawn, sinew, muscle and tendon, desires flex then stretch
Unto four corners ‘low canopy’s lace, each sniff and scratch
Along nape and back, wet and etch anew, as bloody tattoos
Entwined or strewn upon the satin, flooding senses of two

Skewed their sprawled dimensions, queued the raw tension
Lewd within Love’s lexicon, tongues’ unknown expressions
Mouths uttering low, lips stuttering slow at midlands’ gist
Kissed the hushes, `tween the rushes, as agog gushes insist

Resist not did they, dyad to plait, anon unbraided to repeat
Oft encircling, akin Greco grapplers in Romanesque heat
By arabesque feats, thus eiderdown tossed, flesh glossed
Sheets moist as shaded moss, ah the choice to rid the dross

To passionately joust no further, as lust wanes to cincture
So to pine (unlike Young Werther, lacking bane’s venture)
While both souls longingly smolder, their censers by vesper
Unfettered festering, skin on skin, `low night air’s whispers

From sunlit porticos, upon ivied columns along tomorrows
Twinges pitch hence pang, at pith and pit by forth-sorrows
Yet to love once, twice, thrice else ceaselessly, heedlessly
Of all others’ druthers or mutters, two utter adrift virtuously

Graced by thirty winters she, faced dilemmas odd by threes
Or singly so, third worst among throes, a cancerous decree
Thou cruel Dancer, well versed in Womb’s ascetic suffering
More, Tomb’s poetic suffrage, futile the swain’s thwarting

Erstwhile, the swan’s hoarding, raw secrets mid romances
Chance upon advances, time aft’ time aft’ fuckin’ chances
Wronged by illiterate flirts, withdrawn per itinerant hurts
Intended or not, pretended her lot, along tearstained shirts

He by solitude in surplus, she of dawn till dusk, imminent
Independently sufficient, although, separately reminiscent
One dried burnt-sienna rose, espoused `twixt sacred breasts
Laid by poet fraught, yet orbs heave not at Death’s behest

Sonnets with arias, so plummet from summits sabbatical
Canticles fanatical, equally, odes unfold in woes viatical
Devils as wolves, lurk in his literature, then empty pitcher
Love pours, from bottle mid lips to floor, as poetic stricture

Breath faltered as Life slipped, his hand she ceased to grip
“The stars…to be one” eclipsed by lisp, from her pale lips
To replay again and again, as sand spills, grain by grain
Between fingers, memories linger, pain damns then reigns

By ashes she fell, o’er upper Appalachia, to the lower dells
He dashes and scales, five cataracts, veils to slower swells
Per swirling facts in hurling pell-mell, a disturbing motion
Rekindling emotion, reviving a devotion for their locutions

Mêlées lyrical, sways literal, as one ancient, poetical soul
Rarely so, possessing two modern minds in untold strolls
Within images stirred, by words, metaphors or apologues
An endless epic, dialogue without prologue, nor epilogue

In fist tightly, per fits nightly, a tarnished, bloodied crucifix
Whispers bleed from lips, as oaths of gods o’er river Styx
Transfixed betwixt, between two ends, the insisting mean
Persisting mode, poetry flows, in crowded solitude unseen

Ah the passions prolonged, by every zephyr brushing hands
Like her breath then, hot on flesh, as shadows in hinterland
Form in brain, upon each rain, shedding she the shroud wet
In silence he loudly vets, as often Love hauntingly begets


front cover                           back cover

Copyright © 2017 by D.C. Quillan Stone

Bill of Right (singular) by D.C. Quillan Stone

 

    If such understanding forms and foments, then solely amid ceaseless study, ponder and labor, concluding first in part, later in whole, to logically respect then ethically regard, hence fervently declaring then firmly establishing in this manner.

    The propensity, preference and persistence upon observable practice by Each and Every Individual since first reasoned the Specie Human and Peculiar above all other species, thus consistently inclining, constantly insisting the Singular Right to Consent or Dissent regarding Each and Every Matter, indeed without exception as exemplified per unwanted prevention, unacceptable prohibition, undesirable preemption, unwelcomed intervention, unwarranted retroaction by persons ever covetous as well parties ever contemptuous whether private, religious, philosophical, economical, social, political, governmental and more.

D.C. Quillan Stone
10 December 2019

To note; as published in my 12th book, 3rd of trilogy, entitled Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters (May 2022). Click book cover to peruse and/or purchase...

Friday, April 17, 2026

Quote by D.C. Quillan Stone... Perversionism versus Individualism...

 

There is nothing conceptually erroneous about lists of moralities or bills of rights as commonly understood arrangements and practices, even when forcefully imposed however only when consented unanimously then continuously.

If to unwittingly, excessively rely on lists or bills as foregone conclusions, then too easily overlooked, dismissed, even transgressed then trampled the Singular Human Right to Consent or Not Consent on ALL matters, the outward expression by action, voice, gesture, or writ upon analyzing, comparing, prioritizing, determining per one's accumulative knowledge directly (experience) and accumulative knowledge indirectly (education, instruction, study), unavoidably combined with his/her personality, psychology, perception, prerogative, propensity, preference, predilection, principle, pursuit, purpose, project, profession, production, property, purse, portfolio, possession thus the Peculiar Human Ability to Reason. That is to say, if to rely on Ludwig von Mises' definition of reasoning as articulated in his praxeological work, book, and magnum opus Human Action (1949 in German, 1949 in English). 

It is critical to note; if to deny others' Singular Human Right to Consent, the difficulty and challenge rest not on those who propose and concur however on those who disagree and reject, inescapably necessary to justify their posture as something other than presumption, arrogance, violence driven by covetousness.

And so, the following two isms as published in my 12th book; first as coined and defined, the second as reclaimed and redefined...

Perversionism; to consent or dissent on all matters per his/her preference, yet remain discontented, disconcerted even disturbed until others act, speak even think compatibly, similarly by force legal or illegal thus force governmental, social or personal. It is critical to include in consideration and understanding the word and sentiment covetousness as the indisputable perquisite to such perversion. 

Individualism; the constant respect hence consistent regard for each and every person's Peculiar Human Ability to Reason as manifested per the Singular Human Right to Consent or Dissent on all matters. Without exemption or exception, all considerations must rest upon the aforesaid, else the unethical dilemma remaining unjustifiable ergo unresolvable till resumed and revered the one ethos and creed as determined then established since humanity first reasoned.

D.C. Quillan Stone

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Quote by Abraham Kuyper... Finite reasoning can never obtain the infinite as its result...

Many would argue; humanity continues to increase it's knowledge by discovering, experiencing, learning, applying, observing, so much so, appearing as though endless, even infinite the extent of such progression. And let us say there there is no doubt regarding the aforesaid while striking a line anywhere along history's timeline past, present, future, from humanity's creation theologically else humanity's evolution philosophically until now then beyond this side of heaven theologically else this side of mortality's end philosophically. To note, the logic and consistency remain per ether posture and presupposition, although 19th century Western history would suggest even propose the incremental digression from Logic as the Science of Sciences soon following the incremental digression from Theology as the Queen of Sciences. 

In so doing (to continue), one must confess else pretend otherwise the ever present state of finiteness per humanity's existence and various abilities then capacities.

With that said, if to reject God, the Infinite, the Absolute, then one's imagination amid the departure, the depravity conjures endless absurdities as possibilities, that is to say, wildly fabricating inconsistencies as though consistencies, contradictions as though concurrences, thereby fantasies as though realities, while emotionally slanderous, even irrationally violent towards those who critique. Upon continual digressions, psychosis would be the logical diagnosis if unaffected humanity's organizations, associations, religions, universities, sciences, institutions, governments, etc. Unfortunately, the ill effects cancerously widespread. In brief, if to deny the Infinite, then too easily dismissed thus covetously ignored the Finite.


Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.

Is 1:18, Mt 5:9, 2 Tm 2:15, Cl 3:23

Monday, April 13, 2026

Quote by Abraham Kuyper... No man has the right to rule over another man...

 

The theologian and polymath Abraham Kuyper, while later becoming ironically the prime minister of The Netherlands, nevertheless identified a commonly (and conveniently) ignored dilemma per government's perpetuity upon presumption over each new generation without extending inquiry and certainly without soliciting consent. Thomas Jefferson, while later becoming ironically the 3rd president of the United States, also identified the same commonly (and conveniently) ignored dilemma aforesaid a century earlier.

I set out on this ground, which I suppose to be self evident, 'that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living:' that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it.

Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
Letter to James Madison (1789)

Yet still in 2026, Americans continue to be burdened even oppressed by documents, addendums, legislations, regulations, taxations, expenditures, debts, treaties, and many other government arrangements established and instituted by prior generations recent and distant. The dead truly remain to rule over the living, and do so without question. To clarify, this is not a call to reject the past wholesale, rather the right to reassess, revaluate, reprioritize, reaccept the conditions as a society although more critically thus logically, consistently, ethically as individuals.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.

Is 1:18, Mt 5:9, 2 Tm 2:15, Cl 3:23

Sunday, April 12, 2026

Quote by Abraham Kuyper... There lies a mystery in the human mind...

 


Unless deluded enough to fully or sufficiently pride oneself thereby ceases to study, to ponder, to labor, thus to think, to consider, to reconsider (just as important), to listen, to read (books, not blogs), to learn (till last breath), and more. Consequently, one will speak full of presumption and arrogance upon covetousness with much disrespect and disregard towards anyone who disagree, even emotionally diss and slander those who critique his/her inconsistencies unavoidable per such posture. Therein the failed and depraved state that modern society dwells, exemplified ceaselessly by multitudinous inconsistencies conjured, schemed, then embraced.

Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things. Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.

Romans 1:22-25 (ESV)

Do not limit this portion of Scripture to those matters within the four walls of church even the soul, rather to all matters within and beyond academics, sciences( medicine too), politics, economics, moralities, etc. It should have been no surprise when tossed to curb in the late 19th century the adage and emphasis Theology the Queen of Sciences, that soon tossed too the related adage and emphasis Logic the Science of Sciences. However worse, the two digressions occurred largely unnoticed preempting the potential surprise. Coincidence? Correlation? Causality? It would be covetously foolhardy to categorize as the first or second hence scoffing the third.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.

Is 1:18, Mt 5:9, 2 Tm 2:15, Cl 3:23