Friday, June 10, 2022
Email, Various Other Sites, Copyright... And, new blogs will soon be posted...
Wednesday, June 1, 2022
Monday, May 23, 2022
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
Tuesday, May 17, 2022
Monday, May 16, 2022
Sunday, May 15, 2022
Saturday, May 14, 2022
Friday, May 13, 2022
Wednesday, May 11, 2022
Sonnet 6 by George Boole (mathematician/logician, 1815-1864)
Wednesday, May 4, 2022
Quote and Book by Claude-Frédéric Bastiat
Sunday, May 1, 2022
Vox Humana Unius Vox Humana Alterius Non
Vox Humana Unius Vox Humana Alterius Non... See link for my weekly article at SubStack.
https://dcquillanstone.substack.com/p/vox-humana-unius-vox-humana-alterius?s=w
So it follows (to reiterate), one’s human voice certainly is not the same as God’s voice or in Latin vox humana vox dei non, nor one’s human voice the same as another’s human voice or also in Latin vox humana unius vox humana alterius non. The finiteness of humanity, nay the precise position ergo finiteness of each and every individual’s space (x,y,z) at any given moment in time (t), preempts observably, logically, consistently any conjured justification to presume to think, speak then act on behalf of God or another individual....
Sunday, April 24, 2022
Vox Humana Vox Dei Non
Vox Humana Vox Dei Non... See link for my weekly article at SubStack.
https://dcquillanstone.substack.com/p/vox-humana-vox-dei-non?s=w
As logically noted by Aristotle (384-322 BC) per the section Posterior Analytics of his work Organon…
"Now since the required ground of our knowledge---i.e. of our conviction---of a fact is the possession of such a syllogism... and the ground of the syllogism is the facts constituting its premises, we must not only know the primary premises---some if not all---beforehand, but know them better than the conclusion... So since the primary premises are the cause of our knowledge---i.e. of our conviction---it follows that we know them better---that is, are more convinced of them---than their consequences, precisely our knowledge of the latter is the effect of our knowledge of the premises."
Mere conclusions (i.e. outcomes) are the priorities of the 21st century mind, often to the exclusion of the laborious, arduous yet necessary process(es) of premises, observations, evidences, tests, determinations, propositions, syllogisms (logic), consistencies, ethics and more. Consequently, the adult mind remains entirely adolescent, far too deficient to exercise any meaningful analysis particularly complex as well regularly simplistic even commonly routine....
Monday, April 18, 2022
Sunday, April 17, 2022
To Prefer Even Propend Is To Reason
To Prefer Even Propend Is To Reason... See link for my weekly article at SubStack.
https://dcquillanstone.substack.com/p/to-prefer-even-propend-is-to-reason?s=w
Every member of the specie human constantly prefers or not prefers, consistently propends or not propends. That is to say, each individual prefers or propends “this” else prefers or propends “that” then prefers or propends “that” else prefers or propends “this” and so on. Preference even Propensity are neither an elected preoccupations nor chosen activities, rather continuous states of human existence. To contend the self-evident, to reason is human (see Proem & Poem Nos. 22-24, 33, 34) is to redundantly confirm to prefer even propend is to reason else something instinctive....
Saturday, April 16, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 275
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
Poetry is harmonious utilization of thought and language as much as logic the science of sciences, thus empirical considerations, methodical categorizations, analytical comparisons then logical conclusions inevitably lending towards observable constancies, practical consistencies, applicable ethics or moralities, as well beautiful even astonishing poetics.
With that said, consider the below quote taken from the work Sic Et Non by Peter Abelard (1079-1142), as diligently stated by the philosopher, logician, theologian, teacher, musician, composer, and poet.
Constant and frequent questioning is the first key to wisdom... For through doubting we are led to inquire, and by inquiry we perceive the truth.
Questioning and doubting observably, logically, ethically oppose the fool's drone-like acceptance of science, fact, truth or common good as though "in" or "settled", foregone conclusively as often promulgated by empowered institutions whether the 16th century Catholic Church, 17th century Puritan Massachusetts, 18th century British Empire, 20th century Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Communist Russia as well 20th/21st century Centralist, Crony-Corporatist therefore Anti-Individualist, Anti-Capitalist America.
Instead, the pursuit of knowledge, logic, consistency, ethic, truth, discernment, wisdom comes only by ceaseless study, endless ponder, tireless labor until one's last breath. The same ends pursued by lesser effort leads unavoidably, inevitably to ignorance, illogic, inconsistency, immorality, falsity, dullness and foolishness.
Furthermore as such, these are unavoidable dynamics or as some would call it, natural laws. Success is not guaranteed but only possible per our willingness to fail upon our willingness to labor. Likewise, to do right or to be moral is best determined per our willingness to bear fully our own responsibilities and risks, while constantly respecting, consistently regarding each and every person's singular human right to consent or dissent on all matters. Do this not, then success impossible thus failure ensued while immorality ensured.
As already mentioned else implied in various statements, all politics are discussions then implementations disguised by convenient, expedient and/or benevolent terms, intellectualized as intriguing, alluring, endearing even titillating isms, however achieved by the sufficient gathering and colluding of the consented so to coerce the dissented. Imperatively as well axiomatically the moral burden of proof rests on those who embrace their preferred form of politics as something other than first covetousness followed by presumption then arrogance and finally violence manifested as nothing more than force arbitrarily legalized.
And
finally, it must be stated once again. There is one morality, one ethic, one
right, one ism (see Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 274), consequently all
other moralities, all other ethics, all other rights, all other isms must first
be mutually, unanimously consented hence the regard for the Singular Human
Right to Consent or Dissent on all matters, as determined and manifested by the
Peculiar Human Ability to Reason, else the entire affair immoral, unethical
even inhumane if forcefully imposed.
---
And so it goes per cigarette pouts, martini slurs o'er high-heel stirs
Seasoned terse withal usual curse, twice recited, thrice liken verse
Mid cornet and saxophone blown, blue and mauve notes so moaned
Heaving as bosom-tones, ear-suckled by hungry souls, each alone
Each lonely in self-made worlds, as perpetuated inwardly
towards
Moralized narcissism, benevolent selfishness per the lowing
discords
Centering on lack of observation, analysis, determination
along logic
So, inconsistencies, complexities aft’ covetous urges
as noble politics
---
Monday, April 11, 2022
John Locke and Francis Schaeffer / Parts 6-9 (1-5 last week)
John Locke and Francis Schaeffer / Parts 6-9 (1-5 last week)... See link for my weekly article at SubStack.
https://dcquillanstone.substack.com/p/john-locke-and-francis-schaeffer-b8d?s=w
By such trust upon a nontransparent government established by humanity therefore fallibility, foolishly trusted indeed is coercion or force executed by humanity therefore executed by fallibility...
Monday, April 4, 2022
Mark Twain quotes on education...
Sunday, April 3, 2022
John Locke and Francis Schaeffer / Parts 1-5 (6-9 next week)
John Locke and Francis Schaeffer / Parts 1-5 (6-9 next week)... See link for my weekly article at SubStack.
https://dcquillanstone.substack.com/p/john-locke-and-francis-schaeffer?s=w
All politics are discussions then implementations of "force" disguised by expedient and/or benevolent terms...
Saturday, April 2, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 273
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
Adequate notions are those in which, besides enumerating the marks, we can explain them; that is, can enumerate the marks of the marks of the distinct notions, and again the marks of those marks… So we have an adequate notion of what Hobbes means by Rights, when we not only know it is “unresistible might in a state of nature,” but can explain what unresistible might and state of nature are.
William Thomson, Archbishop of York (1819-1890)
As taken from his 1842 book An Outline of the Necessary Laws of Thought: A Treatise on Pure and Applied Logic, thus interestingly to note the applicably quoted phrase unresistible might per Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679).
For who neither observes nor concludes his/her own persistence then insistence towards the singular human right to consent or dissent on all matters, whether to then allow else deny the exercise of the same with much diligence and determination?
For who neither observes nor concludes others’ persistence then insistence towards the singular human right to consent or dissent on all matters, whether to then allow else deny the exercise of the same with much diligence and determination?
The master of a plantation, the tyrant of a kingdom, the dictator of a regime, as well the prime minister of a parliamentary government, even the president of a democratic republic, all without exception are fully aware of their own and others’ persistence then insistence towards the singular human right to consent or dissent on all matters, while covetously deliberating, presumptuously disrespecting, arrogantly disregarding then forcefully disallowing the same for any and all. For the very use of force so to disallow others therefore legislate, regulate, prohibit, ban, sanction, mandate, order, tax (then provide, subsidize, grant, etc.), confiscate, intervene, prevent, intrude, impose, monitor, spy as well invade, occupy, destroy, annihilate others, confirms the enforcer’s recognition of such persistence, insistence thus potential resistance upon the singular right and unresistible might.
So
it follows, regardless the political rhetoric and/or social admonition, human
actions inevitably reveal the covetous expectation hence presumptuous
intention, regularly cloaked by the Golden Rule per some contorted version then
sorted perversion thereof, while generally ignored the Silver Rule per some distorted
convenience then consorted expedience.
---
Surrogates dire as ablated by liars, charlatans, schemers, deceivers
Per covetousness, presumption, arrogance unrestrained thus levered
Until fevered, hence believers of such nonsense, ignorance, lunacy
Atrocious come nigh, vociferous the cry, ergo ill the importunacy
Hence the belligerency as commonly ensued by the ever
expansion
Never the contraction per assumption of further double-speculation
Hence lies are truths, truths are lies, reaffirmed if
asserted twice
Recited thrice to suffice vogue hysterics pining for rogue
paradise
---
Sunday, March 27, 2022
Two Propositions on Humanity and Polity
Two Propositions on Humanity and Polity... See link for my weekly article at SubStack.
https://dcquillanstone.substack.com/p/two-propositions-on-humanity-and?s=w
It is not that any one person may be corrupt, nor one person more corrupt than another, rather every person therefore Human Nature corrupt... Thus government power of all forms corruptive...
Tuesday, March 22, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 272
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
Remember then, that I directed you not to teach me some one or two holy acts out of many, but that very form by which all holy acts are holy… Teach me, then, the nature of that form itself, that looking to it and using it for our example, I may declare any of the actions of yourself or any other, which partakes of this nature, to be holy, and any not so partaking, not to be holy.
So eloquently stated Plato (428-347 BC) per his Euthyphro 6, as footnoted by William Thomson, Archbishop of York (1819-1890) in his 1842 book An Outline of the Necessary Laws of Thought: A Treatise on Pure and Applied Logic.
May the mind diligently pursue moral understanding, to seek not lists of acts, behaviors, postures, nor seek to enumerate bills or articles of rights whether human or constitutional, instead seek to deliberate then determine observably, logically, consistently therefore ethically. In so doing, critically reducing lists, bills, articles of pluralities to a principle, morality, ethic, right of singularity by which all things are judged then condemned else justified.
If seeking to enumerate formally or informally two or more holy acts of many, if depending on the same holy acts, moralities, rights, ethics and/or rights to moderate either society or oneself, then ensured are various arbitraries, complexities thus inconsistencies as well contradictions, hypocrisies, confutations, discrepancies even conflicts, brutalities and more. For without an observable, logical, consistent therefore singular principle as the universal determinant, then inevitably arbitrary any list, bill, article of compiled holy acts, moralities, rights, ethics and/or rights.
---
Worsened the naked intuition, the erroneous, excessive
propensities
Ah the sinful originalities (ergo hinted the skint
among the polities)
So go the spark off flint upon stone, the flame `low
muck and mire
Hardening to fuckin’ pride, hoisted thereon society’s
arrogant spire
Surrogates dire as ablated by liars, charlatans, schemers,
deceivers
Per covetousness, presumption, arrogance unrestrained
thus levered
Until fevered, hence believers of such nonsense,
ignorance, lunacy
Atrocious come nigh, vociferous the cry, ergo ill the
importunacy
Monday, March 21, 2022
Burden of Responsibility and Risk
Saturday, March 12, 2022
Sunday, March 6, 2022
Quote by D.C. Quillan Stone... Law of Consensual Unity, Law of Ethical Continuity, Shaefferian Law of Anterior Covetousness
As taken from the forthcoming book Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human Ability to Reason, Singular Human Right to Consent & Other Neglected Matters, to be published mid 2022.
Thursday, March 3, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 271
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
Forms (laws, theories) have triple mode of existence; they exist in the Divine Mind as ideas, and are the archetypes of creation; they exist as embodied in "instances" or examples, in which mode they are laws; they exist, lastly, in the human mind as ideas; thus they precede creation, they are in it, they succeed it.
William Thomson, Archbishop of York (1819-1890)
Taken from his 1842 book An Outline of the Necessary Laws of Thought: A Treatise on Pure and Applied Logic, the statement indicates three modes, yet one implied albeit paramount; preexistence then persistence of principle.
To expected of course the following retort. What principle? He speaks of mode or process. However, the logical counter would be the reiteration of the same mode(s) or process(es) as the very basis of principle if not morality or ethic. Accordingly it has been numerously, variously agued in this and last two books, the mere existence of the peculiar human ability of reason demands an ethical consideration and posture, while the significant distinction among all other species by the same human peculiarity demands a moral outcry if intervened, interfered, imposed, interrupted, inhibited, intruded or invaded.
If observably, logically, consistently accepted the peculiar human ability to reason as undeniable, unavoidable indication towards a singular principle fundamental, moral, ethical, it greatly challenges the common view hence preference for such in plural forms; lists of moralities, bills of rights, tablets of commandments, volumes of ethics, books of admonitions/proverbs, and other inconsistencies thus complexities. For the aforesaid common view hence preference have historically facilitated innumerable depravities therefore atrocities, monstrosities, inhumanities levied upon the singular human right to consent or dissent on all matters, as manifested per the peculiar human ability to reason.
The same facilitation prevails today for the perceived good intention or imagined common good hobbles the discernment, befuddles the judgment, misdirects the conclusion while enlivens the self-righteousness.
---
Upon the lush emerald hill she lays, then oddly
slumbers in saunters
Ponders `tween maunders, liken ancient sages amid
tombs and altars
O the mysteries as Love’s epistles and individuals’
logical passions
Numerous while exclusive to each and every person’s
sacred bastion
Worsened the naked intuition, the erroneous, excessive
propensities
Ah the sinful originalities (ergo hinted the skint among
the polities)
So go the spark off flint upon stone, the flame `low muck
and mire
Hardening to fuckin’ pride, hoisted thereon society’s
arrogant spire
Saturday, February 19, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 267
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
To further correlate although elaborate briefly, so it follows (although see first Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 266).
Religion often parallels while considering particularly Christianity’s various binaries longstanding like Morality versus Iniquity, Righteousness versus Sin, Salvation versus Damnation, Holy versus Unholy, Heaven versus Hell, Form versus Void, Light versus Darkness and so it follows, Angels versus Demons/Devils, Gabriel versus Lucifer, God versus Satan and dramatically iconic; Heel of Christ versus hence upon Head of Serpent.
Obviously, some would retort then claim as unnecessary, irrelevant even injurious such theological references as compelling parallels. Howbeit, would such historically comparative prevalence, thematic consistency be so quickly ignored, so easily discarded if categorically something other?
As much as there is observably critical significance to identify the point in history then forward shared by the Evolutionist and Creationist per the moment the specie human first reasoned (see Proem & Poem No. 199), so it is by the aforementioned correlations, elaborations thus parallels, rendering no less, no more charity the logical harmony of it all if to insist either posture as arguably superior.
---
Frailties abate not, rather one’s state of Self quite
fraught
All a fright as the human lot mid rock and stone well
caught
Fuck then roam, aft’ feast later moan, ergo fight on wet
loam
The mud sanguine with blood per presumption’s syndrome
Ah, arrogance’s drones hail and prevail on confiscated
air
`Hind subsidized podiums too, thus breastplate’d the au pairs
Shielding the covetous glares, the shroud as cloak tent-flaps
Upon socio-rapes across politic-scapes, the fondest of
traps
Friday, February 18, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 266
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
It may be a question whether that formula of reasoning, which is called the “dictum” of Aristotle,” de omni et nullo”, expresses a primary law of human reasoning or not; but it is no question that it expresses a general truth in Logic. Now that truth is made manifest in all its generality by reflection upon a single instance of its application.
George Boole (1815-1864)
He was of course referring to the Latin phrase fully contiguous; dictum de omni et nullo. In paraphrased English, so it goes; it was said of all and none, or to also say, the maxim all or none. In his 1854 book An Investigation of The Laws of Thought, further maintaining, Boole wrote on…
That which may be regarded as essential in the spirit and procedure of the Aristotelian, and of all cognate systems of Logic, is the attempted classification of the allowable forms of inference, and the distinct reference of those forms, collectively or individually, to some general principle of an axiomatic nature, such as the “dictum of Aristotle:” Whatsoever is affirmed or denied of the genus may in the same sense be affirmed or denied of any species included under that genus.
The noted Greek philosopher earlier to the dictum stated quite clearly regarding every premiss, each consideration per objective if you will…
Every premiss states that something either is or must be, or may be the attribute of something else.
Aristotle (384-322 BC), Organon / Analytica Priora, Book I
Then to thematically combine, William Stanley Jevons (1835-1882) well articulated in his book Elementary Lessons in Logic Deductive and Inductive published in 1870 (see Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 225)…
These laws describe the very simplest truths, in which all people must agree, and which at the same time apply to all notions which we can conceive. It is impossible to think correctly and avoid evident self-contradiction unless we observe what are called the Three Primary Laws of Thought, which may be stated as follows:
1. The Law of Identity. Whatever is, is.
2. The Law of Contradiction. Nothing can both be and
not be.
3. The Law of Excluded Middle. Everything must either
be
or not be.
Though these laws when thus stated may seem absurdly obvious...I have found that students are seldom able to see at first their full meaning and importance.
Facilitating neo-intellectualism are of course 21st century societies’ persistence then insistence toward conditions, exceptions, arbitraries therefore egregious inconsistencies otherwise personalities’ propensities prerogatives, preferences as well juvenile fancies, adolescent whimsies or childish fantasies as evidences, arguments thus premises.
---
Well sought per covetous infatuation, un-satiated the
lust
Oh, what fuss the lost of time by respect, regard and
trust
Disgusted by the patience, the reluctance to rightly
negotiate
Prating instead, castrating o’er deathbed as
disparities conflate
Frailties abate not, rather one’s state of Self quite
fraught
All a fright as the human lot mid rock and stone well
caught
Fuck then roam, aft’ feast later moan, ergo fight on wet
loam
The mud sanguine with blood per presumption’s syndrome
Friday, January 21, 2022
QUI TACET DISSENTIRE VIDETUR... thus my ardent objection to QUI TACET CONSENTIRE VIDETUR...
For a free Kindle copy of my 11th book; More Proems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters
### AUTHOR PAGE at AMAZON ###
https://www.amazon.com/D.C.-Quillan-Stone/e/B07K32HM7H
### GIVEAWAY ###
For a free Kindle copy of my 10th book; 100 Proems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters
### AUTHOR PAGE at AMAZON ###
https://www.amazon.com/D.C.-Quillan-Stone/e/B07K32HM7H
### GIVEAWAY ###
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSJ8BTX23A8RTJF
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSJ8N459GFBGKNG
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSJYTM98XB2LNVS
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS5M29YES3ZEHHQ
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSTS4EF2BTN4RTT
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSC9YDLSRRDFXMQ
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS67C5G933VRVBK
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSMXLDGR4HWXEES
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS3CADQKGYFS35N
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS8VVLV7C6BCQEL
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSAHYKZ53KTHC2L
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS8DSA389V5DLVQ
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSSV5WXR9XZ3P5K
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSY3AELDVTAS4VC
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSL7Z7UDNNKCF6S
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSSP9943RQ2QJ7B
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSHVB3L9PY5PMNQ
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS9B97YTREC6K4M
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSNZJKD7RKGYNN5
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSDFPLWJB45YKGU
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSNRHH4639PYJNJ
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS8K9QSH4HCFXZT
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GS4YEY8JPMVFDKF
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/gift-redemption/B07GP5ZQ5S/GSSZGSZMDSSDHZG
Sunday, January 16, 2022
Friday, January 14, 2022
Thursday, January 13, 2022
Consider subscribing for FREE to my newly created Substack site, ergo as posted today...
Saturday, January 8, 2022
All inquiries after truth is to proceed from the known to the unknown...
Friday, January 7, 2022
Vox populi vox Dei...
If Lenny Bruce was alive today...
Wednesday, January 5, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 257
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
Of propositions and problems there are—to comprehend the matter in outline—three divisions; for some are ethical propositions, some are on natural science, while some are logical.
Aristotle
(384-322 BC), Organon / Topica, Book I, Chapter 14
Interpolated among many comments private or public as well the latest two books and this, are repetitive usages of similar Aristotelian-esque sequences of adverbs; Observably (notably, determinably, etc), Logically thus Consistently, Ethically and/or Sustainably. This is the nature of consciousness, reason therefore discovery, evolvement towards all things scientific, economic, social, psychological, personal, moral and more, or to simply put, the proper discovery of all things.
Contrary to discovery thus evolvement would be latency then devolvement per opposite adverbs as Imaginably or Fantastically, Randomly or Arbitrarily, Preferentially, Covetously, Presumptuously and/or Arrogantly, towards of course all things unscientific, noneconomic, nonsocial, pathological, impersonal, immoral and more.
To
reverse engineer (if you will) regarding anything considered ethical or as
ethic, consistency would be paramount to observe then determine, else something
other than ethical, that is to say, non-ethical perhaps unethical. To reverse
engineer further per consistency as paramount, then preceding would be logical
determination upon observation by deducing to particulars, inducing to
universals, else and once again something other than ethical, that is to say,
non-ethical perhaps unethical.
---
To live by the violent blade, bullet, bomb, now the
drone
Palms o’er bogarted hearts, thus the departed `low
tombstones
To live by the politician’s violent pen, paper,
equally the laws
Zen’ed by covetous souls, thus dire effects by desired
cause
To live by another’s leave, forced to cleave, later to
bereave
Assailing agitprop as prevailing backdrop so cleverly
weaved
To breathe the toxicity `tween the complicity and
duplicity
Inflating the whimsy as fancied infinity till end of
the elasticity
Sunday, January 2, 2022
12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 249
Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
It is to be remembered that it is the business of science not to create laws, but to discover them.
George Boole (1815-1864)
Yet contrary to the obvious, 21st century minds proceed to imagine, invent, innovate any-ocracy, any-ism even any-ology as though equaling even superseding nature’s laws. And so goes the declination into the intellectual abyss, dismissing logic the science of sciences, as well discarding consistency the determination of the aforesaid, while covetously desiring the convenience and expedience, hence covetously presuming the coercive intervention, imposition, intrusion upon others by force governmental or otherwise, of course towards immediate satiation.
Boole elaborated further in his 1854 book An Investigation of The Laws of Thought.
We do not originate the constitution of our own minds, greatly as it may be in our power to modify their character. And as the laws of the human intellect do not depend upon our will, so the forms of the science, of which they constitute the basis, are in all essential regards independent of individual choice.
Expectantly, not as the specie consciously reasonable in the Maker’s image, after the Creator’s likeness (see Proem & Poem No. 191), rather as species unconsciously instinctive liken beasts in fields, humanity descends to inhumanity, existing solely for the feast, fuck and fight, hence insisting covetously, persisting wantonly and subsisting presumptuously, arrogantly, violently.
---
Surround the soul with the immaculate scarlet cord, the one hope
Per slippery slope all now slide, else mid darkened hallways to grope
Hands on walls, feeling the graffiti left by histories of cruelties, wars
Tyrannies and more, thus scores of corpses for cronies then whores
Inked in gore and gray glories, downing bodies by
rapier
Mostly jury of one, all wrote and told, whether by
paper
Penned or typewritten the odd capers, printed, later
aired
Caressed then finessed as most would, with a bit of
flair
---
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.
















