12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 226

Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...

Note:
For a cleaner version (format, tables, etc.), see the SubStack link.

PROPOSITION, PROBLEM & POEM No. 226

~ Law of Consensual Unity / Part 2 ~

            Again, the law states the following; if consensual then unity else dissension then disunity. The syllogism as constructed in sort of pseudo code furthers the emphasis per the simple form…

if consensual then

 unity

else not consensual then

not unity

done/exit

Or, simpler yet, for the concern is merely the one satisfied condition, that is, the consensual condition else all other conditions do not allow or justify the conclusion unity…

if consensual then

 unity

else

not unity

done/exit

            However to compliment the law’s pseudo code, consider also the AND gate diagram as well the Boolean algebraic (analytical) expression thereof…

                                 .     .

                        A à     |  AND |

                                |       |   à C (conclusion)

                        B à     | gat  |

 

                        ƒ(A,B) = A*B

            Categorically, A represents a group of one or more persons, and B represents another group of one or more persons. Numerically, A and B will be the respective groups’ expressed consent equally to 1, else unexpressed consent equally to 0, therefore the below truth table (0,0,0,1) or conclusions…

                        A         B          C (conclusion)

                        0          0          0

                        1          0          0

                        0          1          0

                        1          1          1

 

ƒ(A,B) = A*B = C (0,0,0,1)

            As the result, the pseudo code could be rewritten, expanding further according to the AND gate’s truth table…

if consensual

(A = 1 AND B = 1)

then

 unity

(C = 1)

else

(A = 0 AND B = 0)

(A = 1 AND B = 0)

(A = 0 AND B = 1)

not unity

(C = 0)

done/exit

Universally understood as well consistent to Boolean logic as utilized per AND gate’s algebraic/analytical expression thus truth table, common agreement establishes unity or unanimity, and specifically each and every person’s consent institutes consensual unanimity. Though yet demonstrated the ethical argument, the prerequisite logical argument as shown prior does in fact demonstrates consistency.

---

His fingers brush the writ exegetical, as feathers along her skin
She sighs yet his eyes on each text, every verse, so it all begins
To spin towards spun, as wrung then contend, the end syllogistic
For horns of plenty hence casuistic the many, willingly parasitic 

And so it goes, the intellectual throes per goddamn inconsistency
If prolonged, persisted then personal arbitrariness, social idiocy
Political hypocrisy, and governmental tyranny by foregone chaos
As so long the pathos linger well into twilight’s withering Amadeus

---

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.

Copyright © 2022 by D.C. Quillan Stone