12th Book on Ability to Reason, Right to Consent; Proposition, Problem & Poem No. 227

Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...

Note:
For a cleaner version (format, tables, etc.), see the SubStack link.

PROPOSITION, PROBLEM & POEM No. 227

~ Law of Ethical Continuity / Part 1 ~

            The law, to logically propose, should articulate the simplest of conditions upon and within the else clause (disunity or not consensual) of the Law of Consensual Unity (see Proposition, Problem & Proem Nos. 225, 226); if action disregarding dissent (non consensual) then an ethical dilemma else not an action disregarding dissent, not an ethical dilemma rather ethical continuity. As before, the syllogism could be constructed in sort of pseudo code (if you will) so to further emphasize…

if consensual then

 unity

else (not consensual)

not unity

if action disregarding dissent then

        ethical dilemma

else

            not an action disregarding dissent

            not an ethical dilemma

(rather ethical continuity)

done

done/exit

Again, the law simply, concisely indicates two states or conditions; True or False, On or Off, One (1) or Zero (0), This or That, Be or Not Be. Hence respectfully, invokes the third law of thought as explained by William Stanley Jevons (1835-1882) in his book Elementary Lessons in Logic Deductive and Inductive published in 1870 (see Proposition, Problem & Proem No. 211). The Law of Excluded Middle. Everything must either be or not be. Profound are the clarity, simplicity, consistency.

            It is by the above else (not consensual) clause the logical expression becomes an ethical evaluation simultaneously as well determination inseparably. For prior (see Proposition, Problem & Proem Nos. 225, 226), simply, amorally established the condition as either consensual then unity or not consensual then not unity thus applying not ethical evaluation nor determination. Yet by the action proceeding against and exacting upon dissent explicit or implicit, the ethical dilemma innately, instantly rises and remains unresolved until relented.

---

And so it goes, the intellectual throes per goddamn inconsistency
If prolonged, persisted then personal arbitrariness, social idiocy
Political hypocrisy, and governmental tyranny by foregone chaos
As so long the pathos linger well into twilight’s withering Amadeus

On Patmos the mind wanders till Atlas shrugs the assassin’s drug
As polity fastens smug then stiffens arrogant upon the Persian rug
Masturbating their covetousness, erecting their presumptuousness
Ejaculating to their inner adulation within an outer monetized illness

---

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.

Copyright © 2022 by D.C. Quillan Stone