Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
For a cleaner version (format, tables, etc.), see the SubStack link.
Again, the law states the following within the else clause (disunity or not consensual); if action disregarding dissent (non consensual) then an ethical dilemma else not an action disregarding dissent, not an ethical dilemma rather ethical continuity. The syllogism as constructed in sort of pseudo code furthers the emphasis per the simple form…
if consensual
then
unity
else (not consensual)
not unity
if action
disregarding dissent then
ethical dilemma
else
not an action disregarding dissent
not an ethical dilemma
(rather ethical continuity)
done
done/exit
However to compliment the law’s pseudo code, consider
also the XOR gate diagram as well the Boolean algebraic (analytical) expression
thereof…
. .
A à | XOR |
| |
à C (conclusion)
B à | gate |
ƒ(A,B) = A+B-2AB
Categorically, A represents a group of one or more persons, and B represents another group of one or more persons. Numerically, A and B will be the respective groups’ expressed consent equally to 1, else unexpressed consent equally to 0, therefore the below truth table (0,1,1,1) or conclusions…
A B C (conclusion)
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 0
ƒ(A,B) = A+B-2AB = C (0,1,1,0)
As the result, the pseudo code could be rewritten, expanding further according to the XOR gate’s truth table…
if consensual
then
unity
else (not
consensual)
not unity
if action
disregarding dissent
(A = 1 AND B = 0)
(A = 0 AND B = 1)
then
ethical dilemma
(C = 1)
else
(A = 0 AND B = 0)
(A
= 1 AND B = 1)
not an action disregarding dissent
not an ethical dilemma
(rather ethical continuity)
(C = 0)
done
done/exit
Again,
it is by the above else (not consensual)
clause the logical expression becomes an ethical evaluation simultaneously as
well determination inseparably. For prior (see Proposition, Problem & Proem
Nos. 225, 226), simply, amorally established the condition as either consensual then unity or not consensual then not unity thus applying
not ethical evaluation nor determination. Yet by the action proceeding against
and exacting upon dissent explicit or implicit, the ethical dilemma innately, instantly rises and remains unresolved until
relented.
On Patmos the mind wanders till Atlas shrugs the
assassin’s drug
As polity fastens smug then stiffens arrogant upon the
Persian rug
Masturbating their covetousness, erecting their
presumptuousness
Ejaculating to their inner adulation within an outer monetized
illness
The chillness then frigidness, per cyclical ice ages,
repeated phases
Embracing illogic thus inconsistency as science’s
mantric phrases
While tantric praises tossed as laurels on heads of jesters
and kings
Lords and queens, their whores and fiends and depraved
offspring
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.
No comments:
Post a Comment