Most likely to be published later this summer of 2022, my 12th book entitled appropriately; Propositions, Problems & Poems on the Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON, Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT & Other Neglected Matters. The following will probably be included upon further editing, and front cover a slightly modified yet appropriate version of the 10th and 11th books...
Often in the actual definitions as well ambiguity creeps in unawares, and for this reason the definitions also should be examined... If we are able to see in one glance what is the same in each individual case of it, we shall be at no lost into what genus we ought to put the object before us when we define it.
Aristotle (384-322 BC), Organon / Topica, Book I
Primary intent is to debate not the definitions, rather establish then commit to observable, logical, consistent definitions for the duration of this work, as well anytime this poet engages in conversation. Secondary objective criticizes then condemns thereby rejects the persistent even insistent assumption, presumption, arbitrariness, convenience, expedience hence mass inconsistency among an array of definitions and usages in covetous pursuit of temporal advantages socially, academically, scientifically, politically hence dismissively, slanderously, ruinously more.
Hence as defined, there is one and only one ism ethical per the one and only one right, thereby all other isms shall be judged and condemned.
Individualism; the constant respect hence consistent regard for each and every person's Peculiar Human Ability to Reason as manifested per the Singular Human Right to Consent or Dissent on all matters.
The aforesaid ism is the logical, ethical standard by which to judge any-ism and/or any-ocracy as constant versus inconstant, consistent versus inconsistent ergo the latter arbitrary and if pursued quite presumptuous, arrogant then violent through forceful imposition, intervention, intrusion, invasion, etc. upon the dissenter. Clearly, the use of force governmental or criminal, force legal or illegal, force organizational or informal, force thoughtful or casual indicates the obvious dissent of those imposed, intervened, intruded, invaded, etc. Consequently, the following defined accordingly.
Communism; the forceful bottom-up confiscatory methodology towards total control of the economy, thereby property and production owned collectively, publicly, centrally thus governmentally.
Fascism; the forceful top-down regulatory methodology towards total control of the economy, thereby property and production owned individually, privately yet regulated centrally thus governmentally nevertheless.
Cronyism or Corporatism; similarly Fascism in part although eventually whole, progressing incrementally, digressing inevitably towards the same total control of the economy (i.e. United States, most other western democracies).
Socialism; the necessary power-exchange or political barter for Fascism, Communism, Cronyism or Corporatism, achieving governmental authority and jurisdiction by seducing the masses to forgo Individualism or Individual sovereignty in part or whole while appeased, subsidized, purchased with services, goods, monies underwritten by aforesaid Fascistic regulatory or Communistic confiscatory appropriations of each and every person’s purse, possession, property and production and the subjugation of the same person’s propensity, prerogative, preference and purpose.
Summarily perhaps poetically too, Socialism’s innate mediocrity hence connatural inefficiency is the stale bread tossed to the Roman mob thereupon remaining insatiably covetous for all sorts of arrogated middling. My apologies.
Perhaps
important to note and define Capitalism
as the subset of human actions then economic activities within Individualism
(i.e. to note, not United States, not other western democracies), thereby equally in motion
and practice the same constant respect hence same consistent regard for each
and every person's Peculiar Human Ability to Reason as manifested per the
Singular Human Right to Consent or Dissent on all matters.
---
Some declare “Our inheritance!” on behalf of the whole
yet part
If not self-interest of one or few, to covet then
presume at start
To collaborate, collude, conspire as conventions or
committees
O public the postured moralities, private the
prevailing fugacities
Such audacities then atrocities, as whores flaunt amid
the gantlets
Jesters jaunt then haunt the royal parlors, lifting
iron gauntlets
Gypsies dance `twixt funeral pyres as though fires
from the gods
Thus lauds upon vicariates on chariots, by all strangely
awed
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.
No comments:
Post a Comment