Tuesday, July 17, 2018

So I propose TWO QUESTIONS to the self-considered pragmatist as well moralist...

So I propose TWO QUESTIONS to the self-considered pragmatist as well moralist who defends any system of government established, maintained and enlarged by rule autocratic (executive) and/or rule democratic (legislative, popular/majority)...

ONE:
When is it not presumption to deny one or more persons the singular right to consent or not consent on all matters? And if not presumption, what kind of virtue is it?

TWO:
When is presumption not unethical, and if acted upon not violence? And if not presumption nor violence, what kind of blessing or benevolence is it?

For more questions and considerations, look for my forthcoming book, to be available online (per sites Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Books-A-Million, etc) and selected local bookstores....

100 Proems & Poems on the
Peculiar Human ABILITY to REASON,
Singular Human RIGHT to CONSENT
& Other Neglected Matters (2018 / iUniverse)

by D.C. Quillan Stone

Click link for draft version...
http://dcquillanstone.blogspot.com/2017/08/ability-to-reason-right-to-consent.html

Comet let us Reason (Is 1:18). Peace is always a Choice (Mt 5:9).


   

No comments:

Post a Comment