Thursday, April 28, 2016

Still woolgathering; the significance of LIBERTY in singular versus plural usages


Still woolgathering; the significance of LIBERTY in singular versus plural usages...

The economist and philosopher F.A. Hayek was quite right in his masterpiece The Constitution of Liberty. He identified the plural usage of the singular word LIBERTY in conversation, media and literature, as indicative of LIBERTY already lost. For upon first encroachment of LIBERTY, the mind immediately assesses what remain as freedoms (plural), thus a list of those things most endear still unmolested. Hayek further explained his case quite effectively but not conclusively to a final point.

I have often declared CONSENT the sole morality, as such, it is logically as well practically the one and only RIGHT. Conclusively, LIBERTY is CONSENT, CONSENT is LIBERTY, therefore it is the inalienable RIGHT singular, on all matters regarding individual life, liberty and property, or simply, on ALL matters of human existence.

To CONSENT or NOT is irrefutably inalienable, for dissent does not cease to be upon any form of force or violence whether marginal or total subjugation. I may be forced to say or do, but in my mind I still CONSENT or NOT. Conversely, to force or violate, therefore to presume, is inevitably present, consequently do not cease to be upon any form of ill formed justification by one, few, some, many or most, nor by monarchical, elite or democratic/majority rule. I may be forced to say or do, justified by others' polities and legalities, but in actuality they are still presuming while forcing and violating.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Friday, April 22, 2016

Merely woolgathering, NEW FACES on CURRENCY and RELATED CONCERNS


More mere woolgathering along and beyond cerebral fences, that is, to speak in the vernacular of the peasantry...

NEW FACES on CURRENCY and RELATED CONCERNS

It is true, US currency as we know it ennobles the faces of slave owners, supporters and tolerants of slavery (thus Article 1, Sec. 2, Par. 3, and exceptions in Emancipation Proclamation), executors of genocide and mass confiscation, iron-fist imperialists and warmongers, schemers and looters of various sorts, philandering brutes and more. It is also true by end of 1913, upon various failed attempts during the previous 137 years, the cleverest of monetary arrangements was concocted on Jekyll Island, legislated and signed in Washington; Federal Reserve Act. Since, currency have been monopolized by rule of law, purposely devalued by decisions and policies, with tokens of transparency tossed to the mob, so to maintain the secrecy highly coveted by government politicians and their patronizing cronies.

With devaluation nearly complete, new faces are recommended; Harriet Tubman for the 20 dollar bill, suffragette yet determined for the 10 dollar bill, and others. One could say "this is long overdue" and appropriately so. However, one could say "why now" and apprehensively so as well. I suggest a forthcoming transition to new currency, to bolster public confidence in it, to buy time against inevitable collapse of it. Logically, it is a transition not uncommon though desperate as government's central bank scrambles amid ongoing economic declination. I contend the replacing of faces on bills and coins will be first of phases toward new "fiat" tender, so to not stir suspicion nor incite fears by maneuvers more bold (like Venezuela foregoing the bolivar for the bolivar fuerte by dropping zeroes, literally).

Is it genuinely memorial to place on unsound currency with faces of sounder character. Instead, are they disgraced further by including such persons of historical nature and contribution, as part of political contrivances. Therefore I propose this. Allow currency to be as it is, perhaps more of the same faces; present and recent US presidents, Federal Reserve board members, joint chiefs and generals, Senators and Representatives, and so on. In this way, the actual scoundrels and thieves responsible for the demise of currency, economy, general prosperity and well being of all, will be rightly associated and remembered.




Thursday, April 21, 2016

The sole "moral" voice in American public forums

I shall be bold, perhaps arrogant... The sole "moral" voice in American public forums, at least the consistently outspoken, is NOT an evangelist, theologian, teacher, philosopher-of-ethics, positive motivator, celebrity, activist/lobbyist, military/police officer, politician-in-office, nor presidential candidate, but former US congressman and retired physician Ron Paul... See posted video.

President and Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama, as well 2009 Nobel Peace prize recipient, approves Pentagon's revised rules for use of drones, allowing up to 10 civilians as collateral damage for each single target of 1 or more "suspected" terrorist... See posted video.

I fear, among 300+ million Americans, the number of sympathetic ears, challenged minds and disturbed souls have pathetically dwindled to thousands a few. Poetically as in antiquities, God may damn, lest He spares a city or country per a humane remnant. Meanwhile logically, it still remains, to do otherwise upon reason and choice.




Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Merely woolgathering along and beyond cerebral fences


Merely woolgathering along and beyond cerebral fences, that is, to speak in the vernacular of the peasantry...

The protocol exercised by our noble canine friends for their personal incidentals, proposes benefits unrealized in modern societies, certainly lacking consideration among polities. The absence of anxieties of unmanageable proportions, per the presence of unlimited accommodations, as well the mitigation of "occupied" scenarios, would improve quality of mental health immeasurably. Improved further obviously by community fostered by breaking down traditional barriers and partitions, encouraging many to collogue with others, oppose to solo in mutters.

Thusly and logically, it could be argued, by improving mental health, so follows physical health. Perhaps, a natural right gravely overlooked as well, so far disallowed hence mass detriments untold.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Celebrities are lining up to boycott North Carolina

Celebrities are lining up to boycott North Carolina over recent legislation considered as "hate" towards one sector of society. Similar threats were expressed few weeks ago over Mississippi's state flag also seen as "hate". I am not suggesting either are not "hate", but as often the word is invoked politically and popularly, it remains a strong even extreme word by definition, though by frequent usage the effectiveness tends to wane.

Consequently, I am curious. Where is the same moral will to attach "hate" or at least "foul" to US bombs and drones in foreign lands amid endless war-making, killing with no regard for collateral damage. Was it "hate" when hospitals were bombed. Was it "hate" when homes were droned. Was it "hate" when innocent grandparents, parents, students, children, or newly born infants were killed. Is it "hate", for these atrocities continue without transparency, without restraint, without end in sight. Yet celebrities, fans and people at large bicker over restrooms and flags, far exceeding any attention (if any) given to the aforementioned collateral damage still ongoing.

I find the boycott horribly inconsistent to any notion of morality (for "hate" implies immorality), because it is quite easy to forego a very small market share (ie. North Carolina, one state of 50), compared to a whole empire if to forego similarly per endless imperial wars.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Monday, April 18, 2016

Mr Sanders plainly does NOT include the largest bank

"It is not acceptable that the 6 largest financial institutions in this country have assets of almost 10 trillion dollars... That is too much wealth and power in the hands of a few... These huge banks must be broken up."

Bernie Sanders (US senator/presidential candidate)

Of course, Mr Sanders plainly does NOT include the largest bank and it's financial monopoly, also run by a few hands; The Federal Reserve. As no one included Pennsylvania, Constitution and First streets in their critique of Wall Street (during Occupy Wall Street movement), so Mr Sanders does not include the far more deserving "huge bank" who holds a total monopoly on currency and related policies. For exponentially more are the actual damages inflicted by The Federal Reserve's unrestrained power to increase the money supply by various schemes, with widespread inflation following thus deflation of money in every wallet, purse, account and portfolio.

It is critical to note, by not understanding what happen in 1913, allows the continuance of the same political abuse by both major parties upon the economy.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Note:
When speaking directly on issues, its better to use more affirming yet palatable thumb-over-fist, oppose to the accusatory thumb-aside-fist. :-)

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Mr Cruz's statement is also politicized

"Under Obama, the IRS has become so corrupt and so politicized, We need to abolish it."

Ted Cruz (US senator/presidential candidate)

Of course, Mr Cruz's statement is also politicized therefore corrupt in logic, for he conveniently implies none of Mr Obama's predecessors are to blame, particularly (I assume he means) past Republican presidents. Additionally, he subtly contends an organization whose sole mission is confiscation, that is, the forceful taking of private resources without owner's consent, can be run with less or no corruption. Lastly, if one notices, he is not promising to abolish the IRS, for his total sum of policies depend on the continuation of the same confiscation.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Note:
When speaking directly on issues, its better to use more affirming yet palatable thumb-over-fist, oppose to the accusatory thumb-aside-fist. :-)

Friday, April 15, 2016

One of most misguided notions is one of patriotism

"There's no glory like those who save their country."

Lord Tennyson (1809-1892)

One of most misguided notions is one of patriotism as implicated by Lord Tennyson's quote, spoken of course within the context of a global empire. It is held as virtue or principle, yet by what consistent standard. Certainly such regard is not applied to all who fight and die for their respective country; the Nazi German, Imperial Japanese, Soviet, Chinese or Hussein's Iraqi soldier among those often excluded in the average American mind. Obviously, the willingness to spill blood among comrades cannot be the sole consideration.

Is glory reserved for countries of particular ideologies, religions, or polities, and if so, by what universal, timeless criteria, per whose infallible determination, and upon what confidence and clarity absolute so to sacrifice or terminate life absolute. Nor by social programs and central management by government declared as empathetic or socially just, for that would undermine the aforementioned exclusions. Neither is war glorious in the pursuit of national independence, for it would include as well resulting tyrannical regimes. It could be said and done for freedom or liberty, though questionable at best, often doublespeak when forcefully dismissing the liberty of one government to rule or control in favor of another.

I would suggest there is no such glory, only the horrid necessity upon actual intrusion requiring the defense of individual life, liberty and property, that is, against the terminating of one's own life, the restricting of one's own liberty, and the confiscating of one's own property, until flight of threat and no more. For prevention and preemption are modern excuses to wage offensive wars of conquest beyond domestic borders and coastlines.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Thursday, April 14, 2016

At the core of most if not all societal ills

At the core of most if not all societal ills is force, legally instituted or politically enabled. Unfortunately and commonly, the resolution often imposed by government or demanded by people is more of the same.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Mississippi should be more like Connecticut

An individual from Connecticut enumerated various critiques upon Mississippi (my adopted home state). In this case, I happen to agree with most of his assessments, though few were trite assumptions commonly promulgated by media. In conclusion, I satirically compared, "You mean Mississippi should be more like Connecticut." "Well, in ways, yes.", he defended. Curiously and politely I reaffirmed, "Don't you already live in Connecticut?"

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Mandatory voting will come

Given the relentless growth of centralism thus statism in Washington, manifested by expanding socialism and militarism (both) strategically supported by the two major parties, combined with popular discontent and resulting resignation to "not vote", mandatory electoral participation will come. The mandate will be hailed as patriotically American, else punishable by fines or imprisonment, for denying society and nation of one's duty. A duty so compelling in principle and spirit (I suppose), it will require force to convince, hence prevent each and every person to be otherwise. Once made law, mandatory voting will be followed by unprecedented escalation in government intervention and intrusion in all aspects of life.

Note:
It is critical to understand liberty on this issue, that is, the freedom to vote or not vote, for either is a signal to government of equal importance, akin to the fundamental human right to consent or not consent.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Sunday, April 10, 2016

ON UNDERWRITING AN EVIL, by Frank Chodorov (1887-1966)


A good essay on democracy's failures, and the inevitable lost of individual life, liberty, and property, eventually enforcing citizen participation during elections, criminalizing the choice to vote or NOT vote, hence one of numerous warnings of the forthcoming tyranny.

"Even when kings ruled by "divine right", the throne was held in place by the proper juxtaposition of rival and envious nobles. When the ambition of a particular noble got out of hand and an army was needed to make him respect divinity, the money lenders supplied the war funds and received their compensation, usually a grant of land and the privilege of collecting rent from the users. In the 18th century the rising class of manufacturers and merchants came to the support of the king in his quarrels with his nobles, in exchange for tariffs, cartel privileges, and the "rights" to foreign exploitation.

Constitutionalism and the extension of the suffrage did not alter the character of politics. These institutions merely increased the number of claimants for special privileges and complicated the art of balancing interests. In the early years of our country the politician's problem was quite simple: the pressure groups consisted of tariff seekers, land grabbers, money brokers, franchise hunters and a few others, and the balancing of interests was fixed by the size of campaign contributions. In due time, thanks to professional organizers, others got into the act, and the politician now has to consider the privilege claims of vote-laden and skillfully led proletarians, farmers, teachers, veterans — a host of articulate "minority" groups — as well as the traditional claimants. The juggling has become more intricate."

For entire essay...
https://mises.org/library/underwriting-evil

As part of his collection entitled Out of Step...
https://mises.org/library/out-step

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Saturday, April 9, 2016

Quotes by Walter E. Williams (economist/philosopher)


"Democracy and liberty are not the same. Democracy is little more than mob rule, while liberty refers to the sovereignty of the individual.”

“But let me offer you my definition of social justice: I keep what I earn and you keep what you earn. Do you disagree? Well then tell me how much of what I earn belongs to you - and why?”

“French economist/philosopher Frederic Bastiat (1801–50) gave a test for immoral government acts: “See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.”

“How does something immoral, when done privately, become moral when it is done collectively? Furthermore, does legality establish morality? Slavery was legal; apartheid is legal; Stalinist, Nazi, and Maoist purges were legal. Clearly, the fact of legality does not justify these crimes. Legality, alone, cannot be the talisman of moral people.”

“No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong”

“There are many farm handouts; but let's call them what they really are: a form of legalized theft. Essentially, a congressman tells his farm constituency, "Vote for me. I'll use my office to take another American's money and give it to you.”

“Social Security is unsustainable because it is not meeting the first order condition of a Ponzi scheme, namely expanding the pool of suckers.”

“What our nation needs is a separation of “business and state” as it has a separation of “church and state.” That would mean crony capitalism and crony socialism could not survive.”

“Philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe explained that “no one is as hopelessly enslaved as the person who thinks he’s free.” That’s becoming an apt description for Americans who are oblivious to—or ignorant of—the liberties we’ve lost.”

“It’s government people, not rich people, who have the power to coerce and make our lives miserable. Coercive power goes a long way toward explaining political corruption.”

Note:
The above first point/quote, as affirmed by other like-minded writers, is perhaps one of the most important paradigm shifts one could experience, particularly for the publicly schooled, propagandized American. That, combined with the related thought, national independence is not necessarily the same as individual liberty... I recommend the numerous interviews and lectures of Mr Williams found on YouTube and various online sources.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Friday, April 8, 2016

1913

The year that will not live in infamy, rather in obscurity. Upon 2016, the majority of Americans could not tell you the threefold significance, nor the grave contribution and continual facilitation to US declining economy, increasing political/legal interventions here and abroad, manifested most darkly by endless inhumane war-making.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.


Thursday, April 7, 2016

Regarding my previous post and passage of Mississippi House Bill #1523

Regarding my previous post and passage of Mississippi House Bill #1523 (see link for legal text of bill)...

Is this bill a solution. NO! Is there any possible solution. NO!

For as long there exist seemingly endless list of laws and policies, most of ill logic lacking sound principle, hence plagued of complexity and inconsistency, combined with polarization among polity and citizenry bent on forcefully imposing preferences on each other, within a majority-is-morality-convinced society endowed by unrestrained mob-rule democracy, an ethical as well practical end-all solution is IMPOSSIBLE while all attempts merely festering and exasperating further.

The political pendulum will swing again and again and again, as now and before, worsening the fate of individual life, liberty and property.

Mississippi House Bill #1523
http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2016/pdf/HB/1500-1599/HB1523PS.pdf

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

RESCISSION is the sole logical answer

Fundamentally and concisely, should government do __________? NO!

Per the complexities thus unavoidable inconsistencies of laws and policies, with more proposed by all presidential candidates supported by hosts of hopeful benefactors, RESCISSION is the sole logical answer to any possible question. Assuming of course as principally paramount, individual life, liberty and property and ethically necessary the consent of each person. else all other considerations are presumptuous therefore arbitrary.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Tax Evasions, Tax Breaks, Tax Loopholes and Unanimous Consent

Tax Evasions...
Amoral activity arbitrarily legislated as illegal by government, propagandized as immoral per government's promulgation, media's perpetuation and people's propensity towards political benevolence.

Tax Breaks...
Amoral activity arbitrarily legislated as legal by government, propagandized as moral per government's promulgation, media's perpetuation and people's propensity towards political benevolence.

Tax Loopholes...
Amoral activity arbitrarily legislated as legal by government, once propagandized as moral per government's promulgation, media's perpetuation and people's propensity towards political benevolence, later propagandized as immoral per government's promulgation, media's perpetuation and people's propensity towards "more" political benevolence.

Of course, if a tax or law by unanimous consent, there are no ethical dilemmas per the absence of presumption. However, presumption immediately arises upon the dissent of one or more, thus the ethical dilemma that cannot be resolved otherwise.

Upon lack of consent, presumption is as inherent as darkness upon lack of light.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Monday, April 4, 2016

Quotes by Henry Hazlitt


Henry Hazlitt (economic journalist, 1894-1993)... However I would add the accolade "philosopher" per the tremendous work in his 1964 book The Foundations of Morality, outdone by his shorter but noteworthy effort Economics In One Lesson (both free as ebooks at www.Mises.org)...

“The 'private sector' of the economy is, in fact, the voluntary sector; and the 'public sector' is, in fact, the coercive sector.”

“When the government makes loans or subsidies to business, what it does is to tax successful private business in order to support unsuccessful private business.”

“The thing so great that “private capital could not have built it” has in fact been built by private capital—the capital that was expropriated in taxes”

“Inflation itself is a form of taxation. It is perhaps the worst possible form, which usually bears hardest on those least able to pay.”

“It is typical of government price (or minimum wage) fixing schemes that they escape one undesired consequence only by plunging into another and usually worse one.”

“Therefore, for every public job created by the bridge project a private job has been destroyed somewhere else.”

“Mere inflation-that is, the mere issuance of more money, with the consequence of higher wages and prices-may look like the creation of more demand. But in terms of the actual production and exchange of real things it is not.”

“There is a strange idea abroad, held by all monetary cranks, that credit is something a banker gives to a man. Credit, on the contrary, is something a man already has. He has it, perhaps, because he already has marketable assets of a greater cash value than the loan for which he is asking. Or he has it because his character and past record have earned it. He brings it into the bank with him. That is why the banker makes him the loan. The banker is not giving something for nothing.”

“The more war destroys, the more it impoverishes, the greater is the postwar need. Indubitably. But need is not demand. Effective economic demand requires not merely need but corresponding purchasing power.”

“When Alexander the Great visited the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: "Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun." It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.”

“The ideas which now pass for brilliant innovations and advances are in fact mere revivals of ancient errors, and a further proof of the dictum that those who are ignorant of the past are condemned to repeat it.”

...and lastly on a slightly different but brilliant note...

“A man with a scant vocabulary will almost certainly be a weak thinker. The richer and more copious one's vocabulary and the greater one's awareness of fine distinctions and subtle nuances of meaning, the more fertile and precise is likely to be one's thinking. Knowledge of things and knowledge of the words for them grow together. If you do not know the words, you can hardly know the thing.”

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.

Sunday, April 3, 2016

Quotes by Thomas Sowell


Thomas Sowell (economist/philosopher)...

"Since this is an era when many people are concerned about 'fairness' and 'social justice,' what is your 'fair share' of what someone else has worked for?"

"I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money (by taxation or otherwise)."

“The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics.”

“The problem isn't that Johnny can't read. The problem isn't even that Johnny can't think. The problem is that Johnny doesn't know what thinking is; he confuses it with feeling.”

“Socialism is a wonderful idea. It is only as a reality that it has been disastrous. Among people of every race, color, and creed, all around the world, socialism has led to hunger in countries that used to have surplus food to export.... Nevertheless, for many of those who deal primarily in ideas, socialism remains an attractive idea -- in fact, seductive. Its every failure is explained away as due to the inadequacies of particular leaders."

“Unfortunately, the real minimum wage is always zero, regardless of the laws, and that is the wage that many workers receive in the wake of the creation or escalation of a government-mandated minimum wage, because they lose their jobs or fail to find jobs when they enter the labor force."

“Bailing out people who made ill-advised mortgages makes no more sense that bailing out people who lost their life savings in Las Vegas casinos.”

“Competition does a much more effective job than government at protecting consumers.”

“Economics is a study of cause-and-effect relationships in an economy. It's purpose is to discern the consequences of various ways of allocating resources which have alternative uses. It has nothing to say about philosophy or values, anymore than it has to say about music or literature.”

“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”

Note:
I recommend the numerous interviews and lectures of Mr Sowell found on YouTube and various online sources.

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.