The economist and philosopher F.A. Hayek was quite right in his masterpiece The Constitution of Liberty. He identified the plural usage of the singular word LIBERTY in conversation, media and literature, as indicative of LIBERTY already lost. For upon first encroachment of LIBERTY, the mind immediately assesses what remain as freedoms (plural), thus a list of those things most endear still unmolested. Hayek further explained his case quite effectively but not conclusively to a final point.
I have often declared CONSENT the sole morality, as such, it is logically as well practically the one and only RIGHT. Conclusively, LIBERTY is CONSENT, CONSENT is LIBERTY, therefore it is the inalienable RIGHT singular, on all matters regarding individual life, liberty and property, or simply, on ALL matters of human existence.
To CONSENT or NOT is irrefutably inalienable, for dissent does not cease to be upon any form of force or violence whether marginal or total subjugation. I may be forced to say or do, but in my mind I still CONSENT or NOT. Conversely, to force or violate, therefore to presume, is inevitably present, consequently do not cease to be upon any form of ill formed justification by one, few, some, many or most, nor by monarchical, elite or democratic/majority rule. I may be forced to say or do, justified by others' polities and legalities, but in actuality they are still presuming while forcing and violating.
Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment