PROEM & POEM No. 63 - Individualism versus Constitutionalism / 2nd Reprise
O the mystical to persuade with the mysterious brocades
To sway the hysterical to parade `fore masses to dissuade
Threat of accusation, fear of retaliation, as blades to napes
Forced to pay, so to escape kakistocracy’s promenades
---
Thirdly, if constitutions or any other political arrangements fail to garner unanimous consent initially and continuously, all individuals involved and effected must be allowed to reconsider, rearrange (modify or not) then reaffirm them, else those consenting remain (or not) while those dissenting depart (or not), or dissolve so each and every individual may pursue other social preferences. Otherwise, unethically often monstrously disrespected and disregarded are the Peculiar Human Ability to Reason, inseparably the Singular Human Right to Consent or Not Consent.
Fourthly, constitutionalists and their definitions are confused and muddled, having lost their way if you will, squabbling per arbitrary reverences for one historical document over another. Again, with unanimous consent all are tolerable, agreeable even desirable, without unanimous consent all are undesirable, disagreeable even intolerable. With that said, there is only one logically effective purpose for constitutions in order to preserve Individualism; to govern not society but government, to constrain not citizens but politicians, to preserve and perpetuate individual sovereignty not political authority. In this way, bills or lists of rights are unnecessary, if strictly prohibited all unstated political arrangements or governmental powers as previously concluded “whatever is not written, is not allowed” (see No. 21).
Fourthly, constitutionalists and their definitions are confused and muddled, having lost their way if you will, squabbling per arbitrary reverences for one historical document over another. Again, with unanimous consent all are tolerable, agreeable even desirable, without unanimous consent all are undesirable, disagreeable even intolerable. With that said, there is only one logically effective purpose for constitutions in order to preserve Individualism; to govern not society but government, to constrain not citizens but politicians, to preserve and perpetuate individual sovereignty not political authority. In this way, bills or lists of rights are unnecessary, if strictly prohibited all unstated political arrangements or governmental powers as previously concluded “whatever is not written, is not allowed” (see No. 21).
---
O the mystical to persuade with the mysterious brocades
To sway the hysterical to parade `fore masses to dissuade
Threat of accusation, fear of retaliation, as blades to napes
Forced to pay, so to escape kakistocracy’s promenades
Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Copyright © 2016-2017 by D.C. Quillan Stone
No comments:
Post a Comment