There is nothing conceptually erroneous about lists of moralities or bills of rights as commonly understood arrangements and practices, even when forcefully imposed however only when consented unanimously then continuously.
If to unwittingly, excessively rely on lists or bills as foregone conclusions, then too easily overlooked, dismissed, even transgressed then trampled the Singular Human Right to Consent or Not Consent on ALL matters, the outward expression by action, voice, gesture, or writ upon analyzing, comparing, prioritizing, determining per one's accumulative knowledge directly (experience) and accumulative knowledge indirectly (education, instruction, study), unavoidably combined with his/her personality, psychology, perception, prerogative, propensity, preference, predilection, principle, pursuit, purpose, project, profession, production, property, purse, portfolio, possession thus the Peculiar Human Ability to Reason. That is to say, if to rely on Ludwig von Mises' definition of reasoning as articulated in his praxeological work, book, and magnum opus Human Action (1949 in German, 1949 in English).
It is critical to note; if to deny others' Singular Human Right to Consent, the difficulty and challenge rest not on those who propose and concur however on those who disagree and reject, inescapably necessary to justify their posture as something other than presumption, arrogance, violence driven by covetousness.
And so, the following two isms as published in my 12th book; first as coined and defined, the second as reclaimed and redefined...
Perversionism; to consent or dissent on all matters per his/her preference, yet remain discontented, disconcerted even disturbed until others act, speak even think compatibly, similarly by force legal or illegal thus force governmental, social or personal. It is critical to include in consideration and understanding the word and sentiment covetousness as the indisputable perquisite to such perversion.
Individualism; the constant respect hence consistent regard for each and every person's Peculiar Human Ability to Reason as manifested per the Singular Human Right to Consent or Dissent on all matters. Without exemption or exception, all considerations must rest upon the aforesaid, else the unethical dilemma remaining unjustifiable ergo unresolvable till resumed and revered the one ethos and creed as determined then established since humanity first reasoned.
D.C. Quillan Stone
No comments:
Post a Comment