1. The individual right to consent or dissent on all matters.
All other rights as billed or listed among various governmental constitutions, political documents and international declarations are either redundantly unnecessary, thus compound and complex the matter if enumerated (consider Federalist Paper No. 84), or more likely disrespects and disregards the singular human right therefore violent towards the individual.
Taken from Federalist Paper No. 84 as originally published during the summer of 1788 by The Independent Journal, New York Packet and The Daily Advertiser under the pseudonym Publius (aka Alexander Hamilton)...
"I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power."
Note:
Generally I ideologically despise Alexander Hamilton, although his insight expressed in Federalist Paper No. 84 is not only most noteworthy among other such papers but quite prophetically accurate as well. History demonstrates time and time again the predicted abuse by the US government as covetously, presumptuously, arrogantly thus violently continued to this day.
Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.
Study, Ponder, Labor, till last Breath.
No comments:
Post a Comment