Racism versus Statism

Regarding Tulsa police officer Betty Shelby found "not guilty" for fatally shooting Terrence Crutcher while on duty, the question "Racism versus Statism" still is quite noteworthy...

It is always assumed if the right person(s), with certain moral character and/or applicable talents, were hired or elected into government, then all would be well. It is simply not the case. Excessive thus abusive administration of power begins with excessive thus abusive legislation of power. Obama and Trump are two quite different individuals as well characters and talents, while excessively endowed with power upon their respective inaugurations. Naturally, both proceeded to use thus abuse executive powers, not necessarily "illegally", but by the inherent abuse resident in excessive legislation.

If anyone disagrees, merely compare the similarities, for both presidents as well Bush, Clinton and those preceding, implemented (or are implementing) widespread Fascistic Socialism while also waging worldwide Imperialistic Militarism. To disagree, is plainly indicative of an unfortunate alignment towards the excessive use and abuse of power.

Note:
Do not get hung up over the term "Fascistic Socialism", for it implies Fascism's top-down methodology for implementing social programs (ie. Medicare, ObamaCare, TrumpCare, etc), oppose to Communism's bottom-up methodology for implementing the same (ie. VA hospitals, libraries, etc).

Consider this. Do you support political ideas/policies, domestic or foreign, requiring the use of police, military, regulatory and/or bureaucratic force for implementation. To phrase it slightly different. Do you support or consent to political ideas/policies, domestic or foreign, along with enough others like-minded, so to politically overwhelm those who do not support or do not consent, therefore requiring the use of police, military, regulatory and/or bureaucratic force for implementation. If you so support or consent to such political arrangements, then you are part of the problem hence no different in your "preferred" excessive use thus abuse of power than Ms Shelby's excessive use thus abuse of power.

If my words anger you, then respectively so be it. Your anger clearly affirms a preference for excessive use and abuse of power with or without the consent of all others, else why be so angry. :-)

Come let us Reason. Peace is always a Choice.